News RSS Feed


Burnley MP says she won't pay back expenses

AN EAST Lancashire MP who has been caught up in the parliamentary expenses furore says there is “no question” of her repaying her claims.

Kitty Ussher, who represents Burnley, said all the costs she had been given had been within the rules.

At the weekend it was revealed Ms Ussher had submitted a wish-list of improvements to her London home in a letter to Commons authorities.

On the cover sheet of her letter, she was said to have scrawled: “I am aware this takes us over our limit – please pay as much as you are able!”

The details came after a national newspaper purchased a breakdown of MPs’ expenses, sparking a furious backlash amid claims for broken swimming pools, tennis courts and allegations of “flipping” between second homes to cover the cost of redecorations.

Conservative leader David Cameron has told some of the worst offenders in the Tories’ ranks to pay back parts of their claims.

And yesterday health minister Phil Hope joined a growing number of MPs when he announced he would repay more than £41,000 he had claimed for the second home allowance because the revelations had caused a “massive blow” to his integrity.

Communities secretary Hazel Blears also said she was responding to public “outrage and the anger” by paying £13,332 in capital gains tax (CGT).

So far, none of East Lancashire’s MPs have offered to pay any of their second home allowance - except for Blackburn MP Jack Straw who accidentally claimed too much in council tax.

Yesterday Ms Ussher said: “I made clear over the weekend I am totally confident the claims I submitted were entirely legitimate. The question of repayment does not arise.”

She added: “I think it’s really important that the public has confidence that taxpayers’ money is being spent appropriately.

“That’s why the Committee on Standards in Public Life urgently needs to make its recommendations about the best system for MPs’ expenses.

“I will, and always have, gone to great lengths to ensure that I comply 100 per cent with the rules that Parliament decides.”

Ms Ussher has owned the Brixton home since 2000, before she became an MP in 1997, and used to rent it out, living there when she was in London.

After details of her letter were revealed at the weekend, she told the Lancashire Telegraph the house had been in a “dilapidated state” and said she had “effectively moved to Burnley long before becoming a parliamentary candidate in 2004.”

Comments(28)

mpmorley says...
10:17am Thu 14 May 09

Of course the expenses were within the rules,but are they morally right,Artex?
Come on everybody,you don't have to vote for these people,you can go along and write "protest" across the ballot papers.It will not be a waste,it will show these people what we think.
She knew how to play the game,because her Uncle is also an MP,he will have put her straight on what to do.
Nepotism rules O.K.

DavidBurnley says...
10:27am Thu 14 May 09

It looks like Kitty has decided she no longer wants to represent Burnley - after this latest kick in the teeth for the electorate (many of whom are without work or have to survive on a minimum wage job)I doubt there is any chance she would be re-elected here.

akon says...
10:31am Thu 14 May 09

Didn't expect any different from the soon to be dole-claimer !

Ken Shuffles says...
11:11am Thu 14 May 09

65,000 a year and the People pay for the artex.

Renting out houses that are in a delapidated state I thought could only happen in Burnley Kitty.?

duke bar says...
11:18am Thu 14 May 09

Send these fiddlers to jail;.
One rule for the rich and 1 rule for the poor.

FECK OFF LABOUR ,FECK OFF KITTY KAT

Izanears says...
11:41am Thu 14 May 09

Of course what Kitty did was within the rules. How could they not be when it was MP's who made them?

Mr Tickle says...
11:43am Thu 14 May 09

I think she's missing the point. Has she been watching the news? TV? Her bosses? Like everyone has said.... it's not about breaching any rules it's about "IS IT MORALLY WRONG?" Yes it is!!

Andy H says...
12:06pm Thu 14 May 09

Why right protest across your voting slip. If you really want to protest get everybody you can to vote for someone other than the three main parties .It does not matter whom as long as we all vote together. The last time we did this by voting in BNP councillors and look what happened, new schools new baths, visits from Prince Charles .All no good without decent job prospects and brighter futures for our kids, so lets do it again.
Lets get all our non-voting family and friends, all our disillusioned family and friends and persuade them to give up a mere 15 minutes of their time and vote in the BNP again.
Burnley have been all over the back pages this week, lets get them on the front pages this town can do that if we just rally round and pull together.
I am convinced this will lead to some serious financial investment in our industrial / commercial needs .Why can Burnley not be a World leading centre in some form of Engineering or medical development or even Financial sector .We don’t all want to pack envelopes or fill carrier bags, our kids deserve a future in their home town. Lets do it.

Inter-Rossiter says...
12:46pm Thu 14 May 09

How the hell can she be so belligerently out of touch with reality?

Kitty Ussher; you may not want to pay back any of our money you claimed to renovate a property which you had owned for over five year before being elected, but you will pay in the long run because your political career is nearing its end!

e/lancs says...
1:03pm Thu 14 May 09

Kitty as a landlord the house should have been kept in a good condition where did the rent go for the london house? dont forget to say bye to Burnley next election

midas says...
4:20pm Thu 14 May 09

I think she is right not to pay it back and I hope she sticks to her guns and doessn't kowtow to the media hounding which in many cases is bordering on hysterical.

Don't allow the BNP to use this as a ruse to get thenmselves elected as the "protest" vote. If you want to use a protest vote, vote Green.


DaveBurnley says...
4:54pm Thu 14 May 09

Kitty is doing a superb imitation of Marie Antoinette. She clearly is above the ordinary peasants of Burnley and we should bow down and realise how lucky we are to be blessed with her presence.

up-yours-sunshine says...
4:59pm Thu 14 May 09

DavidBurnley wrote:
It looks like Kitty has decided she no longer wants to represent Burnley - after this latest kick in the teeth for the electorate (many of whom are without work or have to survive on a minimum wage job)I doubt there is any chance she would be re-elected here.
has she ever .....she didnt put up much of a fight to save our A&E department

Old Timer says...
5:58pm Thu 14 May 09

While we are keeping our eyes on The House of Ussher our County Hall council members must be wondering if they are the next to come under scrutiny. I wish someone would disclose Lancashire County Councillors' expenses like they have as with those of our members of Parliament. That would be a real victory for disclosure if a list could be cobbled together before the June elections. Then we would have a treble up... The House of Lords, The House of Ussher and
and The House of Nonsense at County Hall.

bankhall says...
10:55pm Thu 14 May 09

Yesterday Ms Ussher said: “I made clear over the weekend I am totally confident the claims I submitted were entirely legitimate. The question of repayment does not arise.”
What a thieving arrogant person she is ;no morals at all just laughs at the people who voted her in .I'm alright jack so fook off theres nothing you can do seems her approach.God help us if the fools vote her back in .

Darren Reynolds says...
11:18pm Thu 14 May 09

If you're going to cast a protest vote, you have to be sure your protest vote is going to lift the number two party last time up over the top. Please don't vote for a party that came third, fourth or, in the BNP's case, fifth. You're just wasting your vote and helping Ussher get back in by not using your vote for someone who can actually turf her out.

browny47 says...
12:59am Fri 15 May 09

re, the previous comment,what a defeatist attitude!!!,i urge all you voters out there to put your mark against CHANGE ,whoever you may think that may be.we have been let down by the major parties,it,s time to kick em out !!.a parliament made of independants has to be better than the shower of control freaks that RULE the roost at the moment,THINK about it!!

bankhall says...
11:41am Fri 15 May 09

like all of the Burnley councillors they are all thievesas well.I know one who just drives around to clock up the vast mileage allowances they get .They are on the gravy train as well .including some who come on here

bankhall says...
11:45am Fri 15 May 09

just as a matter .Where has the ARTEX MP disappeared to????

pocketdragon says...
1:45pm Fri 15 May 09

GET THIS FAKE, ARROGANT, USELESS SNOTTY NOSED GOOD FOR NOTHING FOOL OUT OF PARLIAMENT.
SHE IS RIPPING THE BACK OUT OF THE PUBLIC AND TAKING THE P1S$ OUT OF EVERYTHING WE EVERY WORKED FOR WHILST LAUGHING IN OUR FACES....STAND FOR IT NO MORE, VOTE ANYONE ELSE IN AS LONG AS IT MEANS SHE GOES!

working chap says...
2:58pm Fri 15 May 09

By all means let's get this woman out. She's been a waste of space since she was parachuted in at the expense of a local candidate. However let's be sensible. Voting Tory or BNP won't do the business. If you want a change only the Lib-Dems (and I'm no great fan of GB) have a realistic chance of tipping her out.

disgusted tunbridge wells says...
5:31pm Fri 15 May 09

The blame lies with the local party for adopting this Southerner, she was never going to live in Burnley, serves you right

DaveBurnley says...
10:05am Sat 16 May 09

Reading the above posts, I wonder who actually voted for Kitty?

Darren Reynolds says...
10:11pm Sat 16 May 09

like all of the Burnley councillors they are all thieves as well. I know one who just drives around to clock up the vast mileage allowances they get .They are on the gravy train as well .including some who come on here

I don't know where you get your information. Burnley councillors don't get mileage allowances unless they are representing Burnley outside the area, which happens very rarely because basically it's not necessary.

Who exactly are you accusing of being on the gravy train? Burnley councillors get about £50 a week for what they do.

Instead of throwing wild and general accusations about, be specific and then everyone knows exactly who you're talking about.

brunlea says...
11:22am Sun 17 May 09

good job i didnt vote for her in the last election, what a fraud she turned out to be.

the sooner she resign from parliament and the better it would be for burnley.

she is scrounging on the tax payer and she must be made to paid back all the money she fraudently claim for.

partial21 says...
1:14pm Sun 17 May 09

Re, Darren from BURNLEY.For years i have been voting for a party that usually comes third or fourth,you may think it is a wasted vote but i see it this way,why should i vote for a party that is going to tax me more,why should i vote for a party that did nothing for our A&E and why should i vote for a party that tells us to tighten our belts and then puts the council tax up, petrol up and so on.And they even have the cheek to let the tax payer redecorate thier house.I never trusted an MP before and i certainly would not trust one now.The party i Vote for actually got something done when the councillors did wel in Burnley more than any one party did the previous five years. Kitty Usher has done nothing for this town and we would do well to get shut of her.Your choice is to vote for the party you think is right,my choice will be the same as usuall.

RAyzer says...
8:05pm Mon 18 May 09

pipe down...most of you voted labour in,there corrupt to the core,labour have ruined this country!!!!MOST m.ps are dodge pots,how longs this been going on???how far can we trace it back too??no wonder theres no cash in the pot,greedy bankers,lords buying there titiles...it has to stop now,sack the ones on the fiddle(90%)???so what!!!start a fresh...

burnleyfan says...
12:28pm Tue 19 May 09

an example of kitty's keenness to help burnley people was this. I wrote to her asking for her to support ken spencer and the people using the thompson park exit. the college were apparently closing it to aid the sale of future housing, making the excuse that pupils were at risk. she replied that she could not help as I "did not now live in burnley" but nelson. this was just an excuse for idleness.

click2find

Most popular