VIDEO: Man sectioned under Mental Health Act after suspected bomb hoax

Photo (PA)

Photo (PA)

First published in News
Last updated

A MAN arrested after a suspected bomb hoax on a UK-bound flight has been sectioned under the Mental Health Act, police said.

The 47-year-old from the North West was arrested by armed officers who greeted flight QR23 from Doha, Qatar, when it arrived at Manchester Airport yesterday, escorted by an RAF Typhoon jet.

Greater Manchester Police said today that he had been sectioned.

A spokesman said: "Following his arrest he was assessed by medical staff and again by a mental health team.

"He was subsequently sectioned to allow for a fuller assessment and appropriate treatment."

The alert was sparked by fears of "a possible device on board" but Greater Manchester Police pronounced the Airbus A330-300 clear after searching it.

Some of the 269 passengers on board the flight from the Gulf described seeing the fighter from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire come close to the civilian aircraft as it flew towards Manchester, with pictures and video posted online.

Aurang Zeb, 60, who was returning from a holiday to his home in Bradford, said: "I thought there was something wrong because there was a jet flying so near."

He said the plane landed and was taken to an area well away from the terminal and other planes, where they waited for 45 minutes, then moved again closer to the terminal.

Mr Zeb added: "Then I saw all the police with guns. Lots of police everywhere.

"Kids were crying, some people looked very worried because of rumours there's a bomb on the plane."

Mr Zeb said two armed police then came on and removed the suspect passenger.

"They sat him up and said 'Put your hands up'. He did not say anything.

"People were still worried something might be on board.

"There was a rumour of a bomb on the plane so people are scared. Thank God for that not happening."

Passengers said two armed police arrested the suspect, who was ordered to put his hands on his head before being led away.

Indian Manju Geo, who was coming to the UK to visit family in Stoke, said: "At least two police came on and took one man off called Mr Roy.

"We were told he was writing some notes on the flight and the air hostess found that."

Manchester Airport said nine incoming flights had to be diverted to other airports, with five of these landing at Leeds Bradford Airport.

One of the flights that landed on time at Manchester once the emergency was over was the plane carrying Manchester United back from Florida, where the team has been engaged in a pre-season friendly tournament.

Last night, GMP chief superintendent John O'Hare said: "A 47-year-old man from the North West has been arrested on suspicion of making a bomb hoax and remains in police custody for questioning.

"A full search of the aircraft has now finished and nothing suspicious was found."

DO YOU KNOW ANYONE WHO WAS ONBOARD? Contact the Lancashire Telegraph on 01254 298219

Comments (31)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:07pm Tue 5 Aug 14

the beaver says...

How much has this cost? the person needs to get at least 10 years for this set an example.
How much has this cost? the person needs to get at least 10 years for this set an example. the beaver
  • Score: 26

3:20pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Lancs123 says...

What a complete and utter dipstick. Name him shame him and lock him up! Theres enough going on in the world without idiots like this making things up.....
What a complete and utter dipstick. Name him shame him and lock him up! Theres enough going on in the world without idiots like this making things up..... Lancs123
  • Score: 27

4:31pm Tue 5 Aug 14

ikap22 says...

What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane? ikap22
  • Score: 2

4:55pm Tue 5 Aug 14

jinx says...

ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
I would imagine to shoot it out of the sky should it deviate off its flight path and avoid a 9/11 scenario. Yes passengers on the plane would die but not civilians on the ground should it fly into a building. Not a criticism but had that happened 9/11 not half as many lives would have lost. But what a muppet!
[quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]I would imagine to shoot it out of the sky should it deviate off its flight path and avoid a 9/11 scenario. Yes passengers on the plane would die but not civilians on the ground should it fly into a building. Not a criticism but had that happened 9/11 not half as many lives would have lost. But what a muppet! jinx
  • Score: 20

5:14pm Tue 5 Aug 14

james!y says...

I wonder if he was one of us you know a jack ,jim, harry . lock him up. complete idiot.j
I wonder if he was one of us you know a jack ,jim, harry . lock him up. complete idiot.j james!y
  • Score: 10

5:17pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Eric Shawn says...

Not really in possession of all the facts, but, if this person did make a hoax. . . throw the book at them. Like the beaver said 10 yrs min. The deterrent needs to be substantial or this will keep happening.
Not really in possession of all the facts, but, if this person did make a hoax. . . throw the book at them. Like the beaver said 10 yrs min. The deterrent needs to be substantial or this will keep happening. Eric Shawn
  • Score: 11

5:28pm Tue 5 Aug 14

The Seagull has landed says...

ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
Did you really just ask that?
[quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]Did you really just ask that? The Seagull has landed
  • Score: 14

6:21pm Tue 5 Aug 14

ikap22 says...

The Seagull has landed wrote:
ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
Did you really just ask that?
Yes I did! Really did ask.
[quote][p][bold]The Seagull has landed[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]Did you really just ask that?[/p][/quote]Yes I did! Really did ask. ikap22
  • Score: 4

6:28pm Tue 5 Aug 14

bow1974 says...

What a total and utter tool the book should be thrown at this person and they should be served with the longest sentence possible to stop other like minded tools jumping on the band waggon .
What a total and utter tool the book should be thrown at this person and they should be served with the longest sentence possible to stop other like minded tools jumping on the band waggon . bow1974
  • Score: 9

7:23pm Tue 5 Aug 14

CapitaBackHander says...

ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
As said... to scare the hell out of the passengers because if they thought about they would realise it was there to kill them all if needed! Divert and boom!
[quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]As said... to scare the hell out of the passengers because if they thought about they would realise it was there to kill them all if needed! Divert and boom! CapitaBackHander
  • Score: 2

7:25pm Tue 5 Aug 14

CapitaBackHander says...

Nice to see Man Utd made it back and didn't have to divert to Leeds!
Nice to see Man Utd made it back and didn't have to divert to Leeds! CapitaBackHander
  • Score: -11

7:36pm Tue 5 Aug 14

sen c b l says...

The Seagull has landed wrote:
ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
Did you really just ask that?
...and did you, REALLY just ask that?
[quote][p][bold]The Seagull has landed[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]Did you really just ask that?[/p][/quote]...and did you, REALLY just ask that? sen c b l
  • Score: -14

7:53pm Tue 5 Aug 14

sen c b l says...

Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group.
This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11.

Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.
Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group. This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11. Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's. sen c b l
  • Score: -25

8:34pm Tue 5 Aug 14

slants says...

ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
because this government are brain dead.
[quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]because this government are brain dead. slants
  • Score: -16

8:40pm Tue 5 Aug 14

The Seagull has landed says...

sen c b l wrote:
Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group.
This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11.

Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.
A sky scraper engineer are we Sen?

You seem to have an in depth knowledge of the circumstances here, I might be giving the FBI a quick call Sen and ask them to call round to yours for a chat.
[quote][p][bold]sen c b l[/bold] wrote: Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group. This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11. Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.[/p][/quote]A sky scraper engineer are we Sen? You seem to have an in depth knowledge of the circumstances here, I might be giving the FBI a quick call Sen and ask them to call round to yours for a chat. The Seagull has landed
  • Score: 16

8:41pm Tue 5 Aug 14

The Seagull has landed says...

slants wrote:
ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
because this government are brain dead.
No that's just you mungo.
[quote][p][bold]slants[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]because this government are brain dead.[/p][/quote]No that's just you mungo. The Seagull has landed
  • Score: 16

9:28pm Tue 5 Aug 14

ikap22 says...

The Seagull has landed wrote:
sen c b l wrote:
Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group.
This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11.

Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.
A sky scraper engineer are we Sen?

You seem to have an in depth knowledge of the circumstances here, I might be giving the FBI a quick call Sen and ask them to call round to yours for a chat.
It's makes sense, I bet the FBI, CIA, MOSSAD, will be laughing at the gullible society that believe everything the media throws at them. It's obvious the towers collapsed due to explosives!
[quote][p][bold]The Seagull has landed[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sen c b l[/bold] wrote: Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group. This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11. Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.[/p][/quote]A sky scraper engineer are we Sen? You seem to have an in depth knowledge of the circumstances here, I might be giving the FBI a quick call Sen and ask them to call round to yours for a chat.[/p][/quote]It's makes sense, I bet the FBI, CIA, MOSSAD, will be laughing at the gullible society that believe everything the media throws at them. It's obvious the towers collapsed due to explosives! ikap22
  • Score: -12

9:32pm Tue 5 Aug 14

woolywords says...

ikap22 wrote:
The Seagull has landed wrote:
ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
Did you really just ask that?
Yes I did! Really did ask.
how thick are you that, you need ikap to explain it to you?
...
You think that, the UK will not down a plane with a bomb threat on it?
...
Read about Pan Am Flt 103 and then Google, Hotspur..
The plan to down any plane, over the UK, when taken by terrorists..
Where this nation prepares to forget the needs of the few, over the many.
...
This country does not negotiate with terrorists.. End of!
email..
https://www.mi5.gov.
uk/woolywords
or 0845 450 2152
for details..
Then chose your sides..
I know mine, do you?
[quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]The Seagull has landed[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]Did you really just ask that?[/p][/quote]Yes I did! Really did ask.[/p][/quote]how thick are you that, you need ikap to explain it to you? ... You think that, the UK will not down a plane with a bomb threat on it? ... Read about Pan Am Flt 103 and then Google, Hotspur.. The plan to down any plane, over the UK, when taken by terrorists.. Where this nation prepares to forget the needs of the few, over the many. ... This country does not negotiate with terrorists.. End of! email.. https://www.mi5.gov. uk/woolywords or 0845 450 2152 for details.. Then chose your sides.. I know mine, do you? woolywords
  • Score: -6

9:33pm Tue 5 Aug 14

The Seagull has landed says...

ikap22 wrote:
The Seagull has landed wrote:
sen c b l wrote:
Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group.
This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11.

Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.
A sky scraper engineer are we Sen?

You seem to have an in depth knowledge of the circumstances here, I might be giving the FBI a quick call Sen and ask them to call round to yours for a chat.
It's makes sense, I bet the FBI, CIA, MOSSAD, will be laughing at the gullible society that believe everything the media throws at them. It's obvious the towers collapsed due to explosives!
Are you and Sen the same person?
[quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]The Seagull has landed[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sen c b l[/bold] wrote: Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group. This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11. Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.[/p][/quote]A sky scraper engineer are we Sen? You seem to have an in depth knowledge of the circumstances here, I might be giving the FBI a quick call Sen and ask them to call round to yours for a chat.[/p][/quote]It's makes sense, I bet the FBI, CIA, MOSSAD, will be laughing at the gullible society that believe everything the media throws at them. It's obvious the towers collapsed due to explosives![/p][/quote]Are you and Sen the same person? The Seagull has landed
  • Score: 7

9:48pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Excluded again says...

sen c b l wrote:
Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group.
This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11.

Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.
There have been a number of independent examinations of the data and have rebutted all these points.

Al Qaeda claimed responsibility and have never backtracked on that claim.

All those many, many people in whose interests it would have been to blow the whistle on such an conspiracy have kept silent for 13 years. This includes the Democrats who would have been in power for generations if they could have pinned 9/11 on the Bush government once they got to power. It includes the likes of Bradley manning, Edward Snowden and Wikileaks who were happy to reveal all kinds of embarrassing things about the US government - but apparently not the most embarrassing of all. And any down on their luck intelligence officer who could have made a small (or probably a large) fortune by blowing the case open.

Any conspiracy theory that relies on large numbers of people in whose interests it is to go public to remain silent for year after year has a technical name: ****.
[quote][p][bold]sen c b l[/bold] wrote: Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group. This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11. Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.[/p][/quote]There have been a number of independent examinations of the data and have rebutted all these points. Al Qaeda claimed responsibility and have never backtracked on that claim. All those many, many people in whose interests it would have been to blow the whistle on such an conspiracy have kept silent for 13 years. This includes the Democrats who would have been in power for generations if they could have pinned 9/11 on the Bush government once they got to power. It includes the likes of Bradley manning, Edward Snowden and Wikileaks who were happy to reveal all kinds of embarrassing things about the US government - but apparently not the most embarrassing of all. And any down on their luck intelligence officer who could have made a small (or probably a large) fortune by blowing the case open. Any conspiracy theory that relies on large numbers of people in whose interests it is to go public to remain silent for year after year has a technical name: ****. Excluded again
  • Score: 9

9:49pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Openminded? says...

jinx wrote:
ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
I would imagine to shoot it out of the sky should it deviate off its flight path and avoid a 9/11 scenario. Yes passengers on the plane would die but not civilians on the ground should it fly into a building. Not a criticism but had that happened 9/11 not half as many lives would have lost. But what a muppet!
9/11 scenario?

Prior to 9/11 there was 67 intercepts by jet fighters for flights in the US, but on the day in question, not one jet was intercepted, and these were planes off course by hours. Ask yourself why?

Bush's brother was in charge of security of the buildings, week before 9/11 he removed bomb sniffer dogs from the security and also took down all cameras and cleared a complete floor for "maintenance"

Open your mind.
[quote][p][bold]jinx[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]I would imagine to shoot it out of the sky should it deviate off its flight path and avoid a 9/11 scenario. Yes passengers on the plane would die but not civilians on the ground should it fly into a building. Not a criticism but had that happened 9/11 not half as many lives would have lost. But what a muppet![/p][/quote]9/11 scenario? Prior to 9/11 there was 67 intercepts by jet fighters for flights in the US, but on the day in question, not one jet was intercepted, and these were planes off course by hours. Ask yourself why? Bush's brother was in charge of security of the buildings, week before 9/11 he removed bomb sniffer dogs from the security and also took down all cameras and cleared a complete floor for "maintenance" Open your mind. Openminded?
  • Score: -7

10:04pm Tue 5 Aug 14

ikap22 says...

woolywords wrote:
ikap22 wrote:
The Seagull has landed wrote:
ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
Did you really just ask that?
Yes I did! Really did ask.
how thick are you that, you need ikap to explain it to you?
...
You think that, the UK will not down a plane with a bomb threat on it?
...
Read about Pan Am Flt 103 and then Google, Hotspur..
The plan to down any plane, over the UK, when taken by terrorists..
Where this nation prepares to forget the needs of the few, over the many.
...
This country does not negotiate with terrorists.. End of!
email..
https://www.mi5.gov.

uk/woolywords
or 0845 450 2152
for details..
Then chose your sides..
I know mine, do you?
Utter garbage, you type! You must be brain dead. Whilst it's free on the NHS, get a ct scan please, for the love of man kind. Might still be hope for you. Turd!
[quote][p][bold]woolywords[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]The Seagull has landed[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]Did you really just ask that?[/p][/quote]Yes I did! Really did ask.[/p][/quote]how thick are you that, you need ikap to explain it to you? ... You think that, the UK will not down a plane with a bomb threat on it? ... Read about Pan Am Flt 103 and then Google, Hotspur.. The plan to down any plane, over the UK, when taken by terrorists.. Where this nation prepares to forget the needs of the few, over the many. ... This country does not negotiate with terrorists.. End of! email.. https://www.mi5.gov. uk/woolywords or 0845 450 2152 for details.. Then chose your sides.. I know mine, do you?[/p][/quote]Utter garbage, you type! You must be brain dead. Whilst it's free on the NHS, get a ct scan please, for the love of man kind. Might still be hope for you. Turd! ikap22
  • Score: 4

10:26pm Tue 5 Aug 14

jinx says...

Openminded? wrote:
jinx wrote:
ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
I would imagine to shoot it out of the sky should it deviate off its flight path and avoid a 9/11 scenario. Yes passengers on the plane would die but not civilians on the ground should it fly into a building. Not a criticism but had that happened 9/11 not half as many lives would have lost. But what a muppet!
9/11 scenario?

Prior to 9/11 there was 67 intercepts by jet fighters for flights in the US, but on the day in question, not one jet was intercepted, and these were planes off course by hours. Ask yourself why?

Bush's brother was in charge of security of the buildings, week before 9/11 he removed bomb sniffer dogs from the security and also took down all cameras and cleared a complete floor for "maintenance"

Open your mind.
It seems your mind is well and truly open!
[quote][p][bold]Openminded?[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]jinx[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]I would imagine to shoot it out of the sky should it deviate off its flight path and avoid a 9/11 scenario. Yes passengers on the plane would die but not civilians on the ground should it fly into a building. Not a criticism but had that happened 9/11 not half as many lives would have lost. But what a muppet![/p][/quote]9/11 scenario? Prior to 9/11 there was 67 intercepts by jet fighters for flights in the US, but on the day in question, not one jet was intercepted, and these were planes off course by hours. Ask yourself why? Bush's brother was in charge of security of the buildings, week before 9/11 he removed bomb sniffer dogs from the security and also took down all cameras and cleared a complete floor for "maintenance" Open your mind.[/p][/quote]It seems your mind is well and truly open! jinx
  • Score: 0

10:50pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Graham Hartley says...

Such misanthropy. Save for close friends and family, don't we all agree?
Such misanthropy. Save for close friends and family, don't we all agree? Graham Hartley
  • Score: 3

11:28pm Tue 5 Aug 14

Cimbri says...

sen c b l wrote:
Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group.
This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11.

Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.
Hellfire se c b l, I love any conspiracy like the next man, even Wooly's,
but have an heart here, not here...
Blackburn?
Have an hamshank with yourself.
9/11 is what it is...
and no mosque will disagree.
they all are up for it..
done deal..


Done deal, jog on.

The Tayyabah, just past Higher Barn St did it,
with cakes and other stuff..
They arranged with everyone else that,
since the little shop wasn't doing to well,
create a war with the Tayyabah,
or Taliban, in English..
and create a shedstorm of publicity.

We'll be up to our armpits in 'stanis,
from the old country,
wanting, anything...
you make the rhyme here
[quote][p][bold]sen c b l[/bold] wrote: Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group. This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11. Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.[/p][/quote]Hellfire se c b l, I love any conspiracy like the next man, even Wooly's, but have an heart here, not here... Blackburn? Have an hamshank with yourself. 9/11 is what it is... and no mosque will disagree. they all are up for it.. done deal.. Done deal, jog on. The Tayyabah, just past Higher Barn St did it, with cakes and other stuff.. They arranged with everyone else that, since the little shop wasn't doing to well, create a war with the Tayyabah, or Taliban, in English.. and create a shedstorm of publicity. We'll be up to our armpits in 'stanis, from the old country, wanting, anything... you make the rhyme here Cimbri
  • Score: -3

1:52am Wed 6 Aug 14

mrcool says...

james!y wrote:
I wonder if he was one of us you know a jack ,jim, harry . lock him up. complete idiot.j
Judging by the photos of the idiot, I would say that yes, he is a "jack, jim, harry". Guess you can't blame this one on the Muslims, although I'm sure you will do your best. He was probably tanked up on a few too many and decided to try and be "hard" and mouth off with the cabin crew. A few months in prison will sort him out.
[quote][p][bold]james!y[/bold] wrote: I wonder if he was one of us you know a jack ,jim, harry . lock him up. complete idiot.j[/p][/quote]Judging by the photos of the idiot, I would say that yes, he is a "jack, jim, harry". Guess you can't blame this one on the Muslims, although I'm sure you will do your best. He was probably tanked up on a few too many and decided to try and be "hard" and mouth off with the cabin crew. A few months in prison will sort him out. mrcool
  • Score: 6

10:26am Wed 6 Aug 14

superdad1 says...

Think Thomas Cook need to get a escort with a RAF Typhoon jet it might end the delays when we go on holiday.
Think Thomas Cook need to get a escort with a RAF Typhoon jet it might end the delays when we go on holiday. superdad1
  • Score: 5

11:01am Wed 6 Aug 14

sen c b l says...

The Seagull has landed wrote:
sen c b l wrote:
Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group.
This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11.

Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.
A sky scraper engineer are we Sen?

You seem to have an in depth knowledge of the circumstances here, I might be giving the FBI a quick call Sen and ask them to call round to yours for a chat.
Why don't you continue to entertain your man, seagull.
This is a serious discussion on this page.
[quote][p][bold]The Seagull has landed[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sen c b l[/bold] wrote: Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group. This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11. Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.[/p][/quote]A sky scraper engineer are we Sen? You seem to have an in depth knowledge of the circumstances here, I might be giving the FBI a quick call Sen and ask them to call round to yours for a chat.[/p][/quote]Why don't you continue to entertain your man, seagull. This is a serious discussion on this page. sen c b l
  • Score: 2

11:03am Wed 6 Aug 14

sen c b l says...

Excluded again wrote:
sen c b l wrote:
Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group.
This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11.

Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.
There have been a number of independent examinations of the data and have rebutted all these points.

Al Qaeda claimed responsibility and have never backtracked on that claim.

All those many, many people in whose interests it would have been to blow the whistle on such an conspiracy have kept silent for 13 years. This includes the Democrats who would have been in power for generations if they could have pinned 9/11 on the Bush government once they got to power. It includes the likes of Bradley manning, Edward Snowden and Wikileaks who were happy to reveal all kinds of embarrassing things about the US government - but apparently not the most embarrassing of all. And any down on their luck intelligence officer who could have made a small (or probably a large) fortune by blowing the case open.

Any conspiracy theory that relies on large numbers of people in whose interests it is to go public to remain silent for year after year has a technical name: ****.
Blimey even the 'intelligent' are somewhat deluded!
Who informed you that 'excluded'? George Bush, the worlds greatest criminal.
[quote][p][bold]Excluded again[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sen c b l[/bold] wrote: Only the brainwashed whom are unable to see further than the tip of their nostrils would believe the 9/11 was the action of a certain 'terrorist' group. This was a professional job as those who had the capability of accessing aviation private undisclosed data at the time of the attack and were in possession of industrial explosives to detonate the towers after impact from the base of the tower, and reports released aftermath of the attack from American conspiracy groups accused an Anerican company of purchasing steel destructing dynamites and only available for restricted use by building construction industry to demolish large properties. Under no circumstance would a construction collapse from an impact so high up as the 9/11. Even a missile attack would not have the force to bring a tower down at such speed and at the time span as the 9/11. Now let's have the thumbs down and I will begin to count the number of buffoon's.[/p][/quote]There have been a number of independent examinations of the data and have rebutted all these points. Al Qaeda claimed responsibility and have never backtracked on that claim. All those many, many people in whose interests it would have been to blow the whistle on such an conspiracy have kept silent for 13 years. This includes the Democrats who would have been in power for generations if they could have pinned 9/11 on the Bush government once they got to power. It includes the likes of Bradley manning, Edward Snowden and Wikileaks who were happy to reveal all kinds of embarrassing things about the US government - but apparently not the most embarrassing of all. And any down on their luck intelligence officer who could have made a small (or probably a large) fortune by blowing the case open. Any conspiracy theory that relies on large numbers of people in whose interests it is to go public to remain silent for year after year has a technical name: ****.[/p][/quote]Blimey even the 'intelligent' are somewhat deluded! Who informed you that 'excluded'? George Bush, the worlds greatest criminal. sen c b l
  • Score: 3

1:35pm Wed 6 Aug 14

anonymous_ says...

ikap22 wrote:
What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?
Most commonly, this is to very quickly survey the situation in the flight deck and make communication with the crew. It's regular procedure from the RAF whenever alerted.
[quote][p][bold]ikap22[/bold] wrote: What was the purpose of a jet fighter accompanying the plane?[/p][/quote]Most commonly, this is to very quickly survey the situation in the flight deck and make communication with the crew. It's regular procedure from the RAF whenever alerted. anonymous_
  • Score: 1

8:37pm Wed 6 Aug 14

noddy57 says...

What a first rate plonker ! The guy has delusions and he has caused much distress not to mention huge financial costs,,Make an example of him" 3 years in solitary,,,,that should deter any other pillock wanting to make the headlines .
What a first rate plonker ! The guy has delusions and he has caused much distress not to mention huge financial costs,,Make an example of him" 3 years in solitary,,,,that should deter any other pillock wanting to make the headlines . noddy57
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree