Padiham dad locked up ‘trying to be helpful’

Padiham dad locked up ‘trying to be helpful’

Padiham dad locked up ‘trying to be helpful’

First published in News

A DAD was arrested and locked up after ‘trying to be helpful’ and babysitting his own children, a court was told.

Burnley magistrates heard how Andre Lennox was the subject of a non-molestation order taken out by his ex-partner Alexandra Gregson and, as a result, that he was banned from contact with her.

But when she asked him to look after their youngsters, a row erupted when she arrived home in the early hours with another man. She then called the police.

The hearing was told by prosecutor Alex Mann that Ms Gregson ‘seemed to be encouraging’ a breach of the order, which was made last December, for 12 months.

Jobless Lennox, 26, of Hargrove Avenue, Padiham, admitted failing to comply with the non-molestation order between January 1 and February 23 and was fined £100, with a £20 victim surcharge.

The bench chairman told the defendant: “You now know that you mustn’t go to the house. Obviously, you were trying to be helpful.”

Lee Hammond, for Lennox, told the court: “She instigated breach of the order by asking him to babysit for her.”

Mr Hammond said the defendant had babysat his children at Ms Gregson’s house on the night of February 20.

He had believed they were going to be reconciled and that she was going to remove the order.

The solicitor continued: “She returned at 3am with another male, who the defendant believes she was intimate with, and an argument ensued.

“She called the police and he was arrested.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:17pm Mon 3 Mar 14

Truth will out says...

So she takes a non-molestation order out, turns back up after a night out with another man...... and then wonders why there is a problem.
No wonder our court system are overrun dealing with muppets like this.
So she takes a non-molestation order out, turns back up after a night out with another man...... and then wonders why there is a problem. No wonder our court system are overrun dealing with muppets like this. Truth will out
  • Score: 11

3:00pm Mon 3 Mar 14

andy1 says...

Any one can lie through the back teeth to get one of these orders and use them to their advantage. I believe you don't need proof just spout a load of verbal and a assumption by a Judge is enough. I always thought you needed hard evidence for some one to be tried in a Court. Obviously not with one of these.
Any one can lie through the back teeth to get one of these orders and use them to their advantage. I believe you don't need proof just spout a load of verbal and a assumption by a Judge is enough. I always thought you needed hard evidence for some one to be tried in a Court. Obviously not with one of these. andy1
  • Score: 5

11:19pm Mon 3 Mar 14

BURNLEYITE40 says...

the female of the species are more deadlier than he male

shady bit**
the female of the species are more deadlier than he male shady bit** BURNLEYITE40
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree