Police issue photos after 'horrific' Clarets fans’ clash

Police hunting 22 men after mass brawl at Burnley Miners Club

Police hunting 22 men after mass brawl at Burnley Miners Club

First published in News
Last updated

POLICE are hunting 22 men who they would like to question after a mass brawl at Burnley Miners Club.

VIEW GALLERY HERE

CCTV images have been released by police showing the suspects - all believed to be local - involved in the violence which broke out after Burnley's match against Sheffield Wednesday at Turf Moor.

Police said innocent bystanders, including children, had to flee for their safety after rival fans clashed inside the club. Broken furniture, a damaged door and three smashed windows were left in their wake as more than half a dozen police cars raced to the scene, off Yorkshire Street.

Club steward Alan Kennedy said that the Sheffield Wednesday fans had visited the club for a number of years and were all CIU (Club and Insitute Union) members, mainly in their 50s and 60s.

The away supporters were gathered in the club’s Benedictine Room.

He said: “There was more than usual - normally we have around 10 or 12 but there was around 16 or 17. They didn’t come wearing any colours, as we always ask them, and were all properly signed in.”

Club door staff were powerless to act when between 30 and 40 intruders forced an entry into the premises, according to Mr Kennedy.

“We don’t particularly welcome away supporters because of these very problems but there has never been any trouble with these lads,” he said.

Police have confirmed that the majority of the images were captured inside the premises, with at least two taken from outside the Princess Royal pub in Yorkshire Street.

Fourteen arrests have already been made in relation to the outbreak of violence at the Plumbe Street venue on Saturday, January 18.

But officers leading Operation Phoebe, launched in the wake of the brawl, believe that more troublemakers should be on their radar.

An initial eight arrests were made, including men aged 17 to 52, from the Burnley, Pendle and Rochdale areas, with three more detained 24 hours later from Burnley, Colne and Bacup.

Police have now confirmed that three more Burnley men - aged 20, 43 and 49 - were also later detained on suspicion of conspiracy to commit violent disorder.

Det Sgt Steven Acres, of Burnley CID, said: “This was a disgraceful incident of disorder and the level of violence involved was horrific.

“We have established that the Burnley Miners was very busy at the time of this attack, and the vast majority of people in there, including men, women and children, were enjoying themselves following the football match. This was a terrifying experience for them.

“What followed was completely unacceptable and left innocent bystanders fleeing for their safety. We have a dedicated team of detectives investigating this incident and the arrests already made show that we are determined to bring those responsible for this disorder to justice.”

Detectives have worked closely with Miners staff and the football club as part of their inquiry and anyone recognising any of those men pictured are asked to contact Det Sgt Acres on 01282 472083 or on the non-emergency number 101.

A Burnley FC statement: “The club supports this appeal by the Police and urges anyone with any information to come forward.

“If any of the offenders are found to be Burnley fans the club will take its own action, as this type of deplorable behaviour needs to be eliminated.”

Comments (66)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:59am Tue 11 Feb 14

Markr says...

Its a pity the so called police aren't as interested when it comes to the murders or corruption carried out by its own, or the lies they told at the Hillsborough inquest.
Mind you they can get away with murder.
Its a pity the so called police aren't as interested when it comes to the murders or corruption carried out by its own, or the lies they told at the Hillsborough inquest. Mind you they can get away with murder. Markr
  • Score: -23

7:40am Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Typical burnley. Hard when the odds are stacked. Made a reputation in division 3 when swamping towns like rochdale and halifax. Impressive. Just a lower division man united. Typical inadequate bullies. Time to come out of the 80s all u chest banging dimwits!
Typical burnley. Hard when the odds are stacked. Made a reputation in division 3 when swamping towns like rochdale and halifax. Impressive. Just a lower division man united. Typical inadequate bullies. Time to come out of the 80s all u chest banging dimwits! Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 6

8:01am Tue 11 Feb 14

shytalk says...

Typical Dingles. The claret and blue neanderthals probably felt a bit hungry and thought they were Rovers supporters.
Typical Dingles. The claret and blue neanderthals probably felt a bit hungry and thought they were Rovers supporters. shytalk
  • Score: 6

8:39am Tue 11 Feb 14

hasslem hasslem says...

i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests.

the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game.

those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban.

.....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!!
i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests. the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game. those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban. .....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!! hasslem hasslem
  • Score: 21

8:51am Tue 11 Feb 14

Steven Seagull says...

Markr wrote:
Its a pity the so called police aren't as interested when it comes to the murders or corruption carried out by its own, or the lies they told at the Hillsborough inquest.
Mind you they can get away with murder.
Shut up you complete and utter moron.

What the hell has Hillsborough got to do with ne'er-do-wells fighting in Burnley?

So called Police? Does that actually mean anything?
[quote][p][bold]Markr[/bold] wrote: Its a pity the so called police aren't as interested when it comes to the murders or corruption carried out by its own, or the lies they told at the Hillsborough inquest. Mind you they can get away with murder.[/p][/quote]Shut up you complete and utter moron. What the hell has Hillsborough got to do with ne'er-do-wells fighting in Burnley? So called Police? Does that actually mean anything? Steven Seagull
  • Score: 15

9:21am Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

hasslem hasslem wrote:
i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests.

the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game.

those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban.

.....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!!
Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners.

Not condoning it but let's not rewrite history.
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote: i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests. the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game. those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban. .....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!![/p][/quote]Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners. Not condoning it but let's not rewrite history. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: 6

9:27am Tue 11 Feb 14

GracesDad says...

Bunch of in bred goons.
Bunch of in bred goons. GracesDad
  • Score: 2

9:32am Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?! Norman T Wangler
  • Score: -2

10:28am Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully). Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: 1

10:30am Tue 11 Feb 14

TurfMoorTom says...

I wouldn't be sure it was anything to do with the Sheff Weds fans - we've been known to smash up our own town before. I can't believe we'd go in mob handed to sort out some OAP's. Surely it must just be our usual mindless vandalism through sheer frustration at lack of any notable success over the past decades.
I wouldn't be sure it was anything to do with the Sheff Weds fans - we've been known to smash up our own town before. I can't believe we'd go in mob handed to sort out some OAP's. Surely it must just be our usual mindless vandalism through sheer frustration at lack of any notable success over the past decades. TurfMoorTom
  • Score: 7

10:30am Tue 11 Feb 14

hasslem hasslem says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
hasslem hasslem wrote:
i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests.

the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game.

those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban.

.....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!!
Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners.

Not condoning it but let's not rewrite history.
its as written in the article
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote: i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests. the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game. those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban. .....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!![/p][/quote]Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners. Not condoning it but let's not rewrite history.[/p][/quote]its as written in the article hasslem hasslem
  • Score: 3

10:50am Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
I wouldn't be sure it was anything to do with the Sheff Weds fans - we've been known to smash up our own town before. I can't believe we'd go in mob handed to sort out some OAP's. Surely it must just be our usual mindless vandalism through sheer frustration at lack of any notable success over the past decades.
Shut it FakeVilla you boringly repetitive Darwen degenerate.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: I wouldn't be sure it was anything to do with the Sheff Weds fans - we've been known to smash up our own town before. I can't believe we'd go in mob handed to sort out some OAP's. Surely it must just be our usual mindless vandalism through sheer frustration at lack of any notable success over the past decades.[/p][/quote]Shut it FakeVilla you boringly repetitive Darwen degenerate. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -4

10:53am Tue 11 Feb 14

hasslem hasslem says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
hasslem hasslem wrote:
i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests.

the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game.

those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban.

.....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!!
Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners.

Not condoning it but let's not rewrite history.
strange how the club steward makes no reference to these wednesday supporters causing trouble beforehand? strange that if they had been causing trouble before the game that they were allowed back in after the game?

why would the steward not mention this?

you need to face up to the fact that your club unfortunately attracts some horrid low-lifes. not the club's fault but burnley is one of those clubs (stoke, cardiff, leicester, millwall, pompey etc....we all know the names) that carries flotsam and jetsam around. not saying that rovers dont have idiots that cling to the club - but we certainly don't have the burden of a reputation that burnley has carried over the years.

i see you have already played at hillsborough this season - if you don't go up (and they stay up) i would advise all decent burnley fans to be very careful travelling over to sheffield next season.
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote: i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests. the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game. those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban. .....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!![/p][/quote]Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners. Not condoning it but let's not rewrite history.[/p][/quote]strange how the club steward makes no reference to these wednesday supporters causing trouble beforehand? strange that if they had been causing trouble before the game that they were allowed back in after the game? why would the steward not mention this? you need to face up to the fact that your club unfortunately attracts some horrid low-lifes. not the club's fault but burnley is one of those clubs (stoke, cardiff, leicester, millwall, pompey etc....we all know the names) that carries flotsam and jetsam around. not saying that rovers dont have idiots that cling to the club - but we certainly don't have the burden of a reputation that burnley has carried over the years. i see you have already played at hillsborough this season - if you don't go up (and they stay up) i would advise all decent burnley fans to be very careful travelling over to sheffield next season. hasslem hasslem
  • Score: 3

11:14am Tue 11 Feb 14

Stone Island: says...

Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad?

This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this!
Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad? This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this! Stone Island:
  • Score: 7

11:30am Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Stone Island: wrote:
Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad?

This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this!
Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets.

Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice.

Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.
[quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad? This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this![/p][/quote]Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets. Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice. Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -5

11:39am Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy! Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 11

11:48am Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt. Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 4

11:49am Tue 11 Feb 14

Stone Island: says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Stone Island: wrote:
Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad?

This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this!
Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets.

Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice.

Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.
Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'.
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad? This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this![/p][/quote]Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets. Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice. Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.[/p][/quote]Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'. Stone Island:
  • Score: 9

11:50am Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Stone Island: wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Stone Island: wrote:
Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad?

This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this!
Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets.

Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice.

Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.
Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'.
You are the wrong side of 40 and you call yourself after the hooligan label of choice??

Oh dear.
[quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad? This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this![/p][/quote]Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets. Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice. Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.[/p][/quote]Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'.[/p][/quote]You are the wrong side of 40 and you call yourself after the hooligan label of choice?? Oh dear. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: 0

11:55am Tue 11 Feb 14

hasslem hasslem says...

Stone Island: wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Stone Island: wrote:
Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad?

This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this!
Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets.

Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice.

Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.
Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'.
it is "not condoning it" but it certainly isn't condemning the action of these hard lads.

in burnley all is fair the sniff addled world.
[quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad? This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this![/p][/quote]Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets. Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice. Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.[/p][/quote]Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'.[/p][/quote]it is "not condoning it" but it certainly isn't condemning the action of these hard lads. in burnley all is fair the sniff addled world. hasslem hasslem
  • Score: 5

11:57am Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -7

12:25pm Tue 11 Feb 14

u owe u owe says...

I see the goons from prune owned deadwood are here to take the moral high ground. A brawl between opposition and their supporters is never heard of. No arrests, no criminal damage never had a friendly cancelled because of a mindless few.

Football has always has attracted halfwit neanderthals, a few drinks, tribal chants and colours seems to whip up a frenzy.
I see the goons from prune owned deadwood are here to take the moral high ground. A brawl between opposition and their supporters is never heard of. No arrests, no criminal damage never had a friendly cancelled because of a mindless few. Football has always has attracted halfwit neanderthals, a few drinks, tribal chants and colours seems to whip up a frenzy. u owe u owe
  • Score: -2

12:33pm Tue 11 Feb 14

drunken donut says...

Burnley "fans" are in the top 5 worst fans in all the football league for their behaviour, I have been to almost all the grounds in the football league and have only been attacked twice, both times by these knuckle dragging scum, neither time was I wearing colours or drawing attention to myself, I was only guilty of being with fellow Rovers fans. These Neanderthals are still living in the 70s, people like the swivel eyed slavering "silly seagull" typify these throwbacks that terrorise even their own town.
Burnley "fans" are in the top 5 worst fans in all the football league for their behaviour, I have been to almost all the grounds in the football league and have only been attacked twice, both times by these knuckle dragging scum, neither time was I wearing colours or drawing attention to myself, I was only guilty of being with fellow Rovers fans. These Neanderthals are still living in the 70s, people like the swivel eyed slavering "silly seagull" typify these throwbacks that terrorise even their own town. drunken donut
  • Score: 3

12:51pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

drunken donut wrote:
Burnley "fans" are in the top 5 worst fans in all the football league for their behaviour, I have been to almost all the grounds in the football league and have only been attacked twice, both times by these knuckle dragging scum, neither time was I wearing colours or drawing attention to myself, I was only guilty of being with fellow Rovers fans. These Neanderthals are still living in the 70s, people like the swivel eyed slavering "silly seagull" typify these throwbacks that terrorise even their own town.
Is that an official chart?

Who is number one?
[quote][p][bold]drunken donut[/bold] wrote: Burnley "fans" are in the top 5 worst fans in all the football league for their behaviour, I have been to almost all the grounds in the football league and have only been attacked twice, both times by these knuckle dragging scum, neither time was I wearing colours or drawing attention to myself, I was only guilty of being with fellow Rovers fans. These Neanderthals are still living in the 70s, people like the swivel eyed slavering "silly seagull" typify these throwbacks that terrorise even their own town.[/p][/quote]Is that an official chart? Who is number one? Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: 3

1:02pm Tue 11 Feb 14

hasslem hasslem says...

u owe u owe wrote:
I see the goons from prune owned deadwood are here to take the moral high ground. A brawl between opposition and their supporters is never heard of. No arrests, no criminal damage never had a friendly cancelled because of a mindless few.

Football has always has attracted halfwit neanderthals, a few drinks, tribal chants and colours seems to whip up a frenzy.
so, you don't think your club has got a problem?

fair enough keep burying your head in the sand. i am not taking any moral high ground - but denying there is an issue at your club merely perpetuates the problem.

but then again you seem to think it's ok.
[quote][p][bold]u owe u owe[/bold] wrote: I see the goons from prune owned deadwood are here to take the moral high ground. A brawl between opposition and their supporters is never heard of. No arrests, no criminal damage never had a friendly cancelled because of a mindless few. Football has always has attracted halfwit neanderthals, a few drinks, tribal chants and colours seems to whip up a frenzy.[/p][/quote]so, you don't think your club has got a problem? fair enough keep burying your head in the sand. i am not taking any moral high ground - but denying there is an issue at your club merely perpetuates the problem. but then again you seem to think it's ok. hasslem hasslem
  • Score: 7

1:25pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

hasslem hasslem wrote:
u owe u owe wrote:
I see the goons from prune owned deadwood are here to take the moral high ground. A brawl between opposition and their supporters is never heard of. No arrests, no criminal damage never had a friendly cancelled because of a mindless few.

Football has always has attracted halfwit neanderthals, a few drinks, tribal chants and colours seems to whip up a frenzy.
so, you don't think your club has got a problem?

fair enough keep burying your head in the sand. i am not taking any moral high ground - but denying there is an issue at your club merely perpetuates the problem.

but then again you seem to think it's ok.
Whereas your club has supporters who like to give abuse and scream obscenities at kids playing in the FA Youth Cup.

Suppose that's different eh?

Hypocrites.
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]u owe u owe[/bold] wrote: I see the goons from prune owned deadwood are here to take the moral high ground. A brawl between opposition and their supporters is never heard of. No arrests, no criminal damage never had a friendly cancelled because of a mindless few. Football has always has attracted halfwit neanderthals, a few drinks, tribal chants and colours seems to whip up a frenzy.[/p][/quote]so, you don't think your club has got a problem? fair enough keep burying your head in the sand. i am not taking any moral high ground - but denying there is an issue at your club merely perpetuates the problem. but then again you seem to think it's ok.[/p][/quote]Whereas your club has supporters who like to give abuse and scream obscenities at kids playing in the FA Youth Cup. Suppose that's different eh? Hypocrites. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -3

1:27pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy! Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 2

1:40pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have!
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy![/p][/quote]and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have! Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 1

1:40pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
I think you definitely got smacked off a Burnley fan when you were younger, it would explain your mad-as-a-bag of frogs incoherent ramblings that you have posted on this thread.

Is that correct? You got issues with those nasty, awful Clarets have you? Did one of them give you a Burnley Wallet and you have never recovered from the shame?

It's OK sunshine, to be honest it's good to see you are using the pages of the LT to vent your frustrations and annoyance at those nasty, horrible, naughty, Burnley fans who did this to you.

Give the Samaritans a bell, I assume you've got them on speed dial.
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy![/p][/quote]I think you definitely got smacked off a Burnley fan when you were younger, it would explain your mad-as-a-bag of frogs incoherent ramblings that you have posted on this thread. Is that correct? You got issues with those nasty, awful Clarets have you? Did one of them give you a Burnley Wallet and you have never recovered from the shame? It's OK sunshine, to be honest it's good to see you are using the pages of the LT to vent your frustrations and annoyance at those nasty, horrible, naughty, Burnley fans who did this to you. Give the Samaritans a bell, I assume you've got them on speed dial. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -2

1:42pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have!
Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune.

A definite retard trick.
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy![/p][/quote]and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have![/p][/quote]Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune. A definite retard trick. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -2

1:48pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Steven Seagull says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
I wouldn't be sure it was anything to do with the Sheff Weds fans - we've been known to smash up our own town before. I can't believe we'd go in mob handed to sort out some OAP's. Surely it must just be our usual mindless vandalism through sheer frustration at lack of any notable success over the past decades.
Chin dribbling deluded no dad.
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: I wouldn't be sure it was anything to do with the Sheff Weds fans - we've been known to smash up our own town before. I can't believe we'd go in mob handed to sort out some OAP's. Surely it must just be our usual mindless vandalism through sheer frustration at lack of any notable success over the past decades.[/p][/quote]Chin dribbling deluded no dad. Steven Seagull
  • Score: -4

1:59pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have!
Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune.

A definite retard trick.
oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy![/p][/quote]and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have![/p][/quote]Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune. A definite retard trick.[/p][/quote]oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well. Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 5

2:00pm Tue 11 Feb 14

CeeBee85 says...

Haha never ceases to amaze me how a group of grown men are reduced to behaving like infantile, slack jawed bi***hes, hurling petty insults at each other as soon as football is mentioned. Get a life guys...
Haha never ceases to amaze me how a group of grown men are reduced to behaving like infantile, slack jawed bi***hes, hurling petty insults at each other as soon as football is mentioned. Get a life guys... CeeBee85
  • Score: 6

2:03pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Steven Seagull says...

drunken donut wrote:
Burnley "fans" are in the top 5 worst fans in all the football league for their behaviour, I have been to almost all the grounds in the football league and have only been attacked twice, both times by these knuckle dragging scum, neither time was I wearing colours or drawing attention to myself, I was only guilty of being with fellow Rovers fans. These Neanderthals are still living in the 70s, people like the swivel eyed slavering "silly seagull" typify these throwbacks that terrorise even their own town.
Thank you for those astounding facts stato. Would you like to lead us to the source of your information that took you to that conclusion or have you just made it up inside that very bizarre often barren wasteland between your oversized ears.

We'll see who's still living in the 70's come March 9th when there's a hoard of Shadsworth's finest Bog trotters running down Bolton Road after the procession of Burnley supporters coaches shaking their fists and growling at the amazing horseless carriages.

Note how there will be over 4000 in the away end at your sinkhole as opposed to the pathetic offering you brought with tickets still going spare on the day. Classless and embarrassing.
[quote][p][bold]drunken donut[/bold] wrote: Burnley "fans" are in the top 5 worst fans in all the football league for their behaviour, I have been to almost all the grounds in the football league and have only been attacked twice, both times by these knuckle dragging scum, neither time was I wearing colours or drawing attention to myself, I was only guilty of being with fellow Rovers fans. These Neanderthals are still living in the 70s, people like the swivel eyed slavering "silly seagull" typify these throwbacks that terrorise even their own town.[/p][/quote]Thank you for those astounding facts stato. Would you like to lead us to the source of your information that took you to that conclusion or have you just made it up inside that very bizarre often barren wasteland between your oversized ears. We'll see who's still living in the 70's come March 9th when there's a hoard of Shadsworth's finest Bog trotters running down Bolton Road after the procession of Burnley supporters coaches shaking their fists and growling at the amazing horseless carriages. Note how there will be over 4000 in the away end at your sinkhole as opposed to the pathetic offering you brought with tickets still going spare on the day. Classless and embarrassing. Steven Seagull
  • Score: -1

2:13pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Steven Seagull says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have!
Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune.

A definite retard trick.
oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.
Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre.

The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside.

Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing.
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy![/p][/quote]and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have![/p][/quote]Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune. A definite retard trick.[/p][/quote]oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.[/p][/quote]Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre. The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside. Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing. Steven Seagull
  • Score: -4

2:13pm Tue 11 Feb 14

hasslem hasslem says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
hasslem hasslem wrote:
u owe u owe wrote:
I see the goons from prune owned deadwood are here to take the moral high ground. A brawl between opposition and their supporters is never heard of. No arrests, no criminal damage never had a friendly cancelled because of a mindless few.

Football has always has attracted halfwit neanderthals, a few drinks, tribal chants and colours seems to whip up a frenzy.
so, you don't think your club has got a problem?

fair enough keep burying your head in the sand. i am not taking any moral high ground - but denying there is an issue at your club merely perpetuates the problem.

but then again you seem to think it's ok.
Whereas your club has supporters who like to give abuse and scream obscenities at kids playing in the FA Youth Cup.

Suppose that's different eh?

Hypocrites.
fyi - i went to that burnley v rovers youth cup semi-final at turf moor with some burnley supporting friends of mine as their guest. sat with them in the hargreaves stand - my friend's son and his father in law were giving me some gentle ribbing during the game - then some meat-head sat behind us started to give me some insane abuse and wanted to kick my head in - for sitting with my friends family.....and had to be restrained - but then continued to give me verbals throughout the rest of the game......in a youth cup match. lovely.
again i say these are idiots that attach themselves to burnley - it is not the club or 'ewt to do with decent supporters......but evil only triumphs when good men stay silent.

i note you still have not condemned the idiots that attacked the wednesday fans and still are blaming the south yorkshire group.
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]u owe u owe[/bold] wrote: I see the goons from prune owned deadwood are here to take the moral high ground. A brawl between opposition and their supporters is never heard of. No arrests, no criminal damage never had a friendly cancelled because of a mindless few. Football has always has attracted halfwit neanderthals, a few drinks, tribal chants and colours seems to whip up a frenzy.[/p][/quote]so, you don't think your club has got a problem? fair enough keep burying your head in the sand. i am not taking any moral high ground - but denying there is an issue at your club merely perpetuates the problem. but then again you seem to think it's ok.[/p][/quote]Whereas your club has supporters who like to give abuse and scream obscenities at kids playing in the FA Youth Cup. Suppose that's different eh? Hypocrites.[/p][/quote]fyi - i went to that burnley v rovers youth cup semi-final at turf moor with some burnley supporting friends of mine as their guest. sat with them in the hargreaves stand - my friend's son and his father in law were giving me some gentle ribbing during the game - then some meat-head sat behind us started to give me some insane abuse and wanted to kick my head in - for sitting with my friends family.....and had to be restrained - but then continued to give me verbals throughout the rest of the game......in a youth cup match. lovely. again i say these are idiots that attach themselves to burnley - it is not the club or 'ewt to do with decent supporters......but evil only triumphs when good men stay silent. i note you still have not condemned the idiots that attacked the wednesday fans and still are blaming the south yorkshire group. hasslem hasslem
  • Score: 9

2:19pm Tue 11 Feb 14

midas says...

The quality of the pictures are terrible!
The quality of the pictures are terrible! midas
  • Score: 3

2:21pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Steven Seagull wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have!
Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune.

A definite retard trick.
oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.
Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre.

The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside.

Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing.
Pointless and baseless insults? Shhhhh.... whats the point? Im trying to help your friend here. Unless youve got something to bring to the table id keep out of it. And i know its probably a bit above your intellect level but i will put it in simple terms for you: Im trying to find out why Bubbles is so insecure, weak and inadequate that he justifys gang violence on elderly people, and also why he calls people junkies yet glorifys cocaine use in his user name. it could get interesting. lets see what he comes up with...
[quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy![/p][/quote]and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have![/p][/quote]Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune. A definite retard trick.[/p][/quote]oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.[/p][/quote]Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre. The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside. Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing.[/p][/quote]Pointless and baseless insults? Shhhhh.... whats the point? Im trying to help your friend here. Unless youve got something to bring to the table id keep out of it. And i know its probably a bit above your intellect level but i will put it in simple terms for you: Im trying to find out why Bubbles is so insecure, weak and inadequate that he justifys gang violence on elderly people, and also why he calls people junkies yet glorifys cocaine use in his user name. it could get interesting. lets see what he comes up with... Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 2

2:30pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Steven Seagull wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have!
Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune.

A definite retard trick.
oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.
Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre.

The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside.

Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing.
Pointless and baseless insults? Shhhhh.... whats the point? Im trying to help your friend here. Unless youve got something to bring to the table id keep out of it. And i know its probably a bit above your intellect level but i will put it in simple terms for you: Im trying to find out why Bubbles is so insecure, weak and inadequate that he justifys gang violence on elderly people, and also why he calls people junkies yet glorifys cocaine use in his user name. it could get interesting. lets see what he comes up with...
Please feel free to point out where I have justified gang violence on the elderly?

Please also confirm where I have called anyone a junky.

Thanks in advance
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy![/p][/quote]and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have![/p][/quote]Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune. A definite retard trick.[/p][/quote]oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.[/p][/quote]Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre. The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside. Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing.[/p][/quote]Pointless and baseless insults? Shhhhh.... whats the point? Im trying to help your friend here. Unless youve got something to bring to the table id keep out of it. And i know its probably a bit above your intellect level but i will put it in simple terms for you: Im trying to find out why Bubbles is so insecure, weak and inadequate that he justifys gang violence on elderly people, and also why he calls people junkies yet glorifys cocaine use in his user name. it could get interesting. lets see what he comes up with...[/p][/quote]Please feel free to point out where I have justified gang violence on the elderly? Please also confirm where I have called anyone a junky. Thanks in advance Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -2

2:42pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Steven Seagull wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have!
Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune.

A definite retard trick.
oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.
Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre.

The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside.

Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing.
Pointless and baseless insults? Shhhhh.... whats the point? Im trying to help your friend here. Unless youve got something to bring to the table id keep out of it. And i know its probably a bit above your intellect level but i will put it in simple terms for you: Im trying to find out why Bubbles is so insecure, weak and inadequate that he justifys gang violence on elderly people, and also why he calls people junkies yet glorifys cocaine use in his user name. it could get interesting. lets see what he comes up with...
Please feel free to point out where I have justified gang violence on the elderly?

Please also confirm where I have called anyone a junky.

Thanks in advance
you are welcome Bubbles.

And here is the information you are after:

You suggested i was a junky when you said "Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?" and yet your user name clearly glorifies cocaine use

and:

You justified the gang attack on the old people when you (wrongly) stated "Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners" (this was totally undermined by the landlord of the miners who said of the SWFC fans "they were all properly signed in" and that " there has never been any trouble with these lads".

Now back to my questions of you Bubbles... why do you justify gang violence on innocent elderly football fans and why do you call people junkies and yet glorify cocaine use in your user name?

Thanks in advance!
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy![/p][/quote]and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have![/p][/quote]Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune. A definite retard trick.[/p][/quote]oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.[/p][/quote]Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre. The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside. Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing.[/p][/quote]Pointless and baseless insults? Shhhhh.... whats the point? Im trying to help your friend here. Unless youve got something to bring to the table id keep out of it. And i know its probably a bit above your intellect level but i will put it in simple terms for you: Im trying to find out why Bubbles is so insecure, weak and inadequate that he justifys gang violence on elderly people, and also why he calls people junkies yet glorifys cocaine use in his user name. it could get interesting. lets see what he comes up with...[/p][/quote]Please feel free to point out where I have justified gang violence on the elderly? Please also confirm where I have called anyone a junky. Thanks in advance[/p][/quote]you are welcome Bubbles. And here is the information you are after: You suggested i was a junky when you said "Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?" and yet your user name clearly glorifies cocaine use and: You justified the gang attack on the old people when you (wrongly) stated "Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners" (this was totally undermined by the landlord of the miners who said of the SWFC fans "they were all properly signed in" and that " there has never been any trouble with these lads". Now back to my questions of you Bubbles... why do you justify gang violence on innocent elderly football fans and why do you call people junkies and yet glorify cocaine use in your user name? Thanks in advance! Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 4

3:02pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

No reply? Youre too easy Bubbles. Know your place eh liitle man! and next time you are bubbled up, chest banging and 'wanting to' but 'not quite being brave enough' to smack some vulnerable away fan, you just remember that you are a no-mark, cowardly, contradictory, under-achieving, invisible to society and especially the opposite sex, angry and confused little cretin who will never be anything other than a fantasist and loser. There... i answered it for you! Hope it helps Bubbles. Cheerio!
No reply? Youre too easy Bubbles. Know your place eh liitle man! and next time you are bubbled up, chest banging and 'wanting to' but 'not quite being brave enough' to smack some vulnerable away fan, you just remember that you are a no-mark, cowardly, contradictory, under-achieving, invisible to society and especially the opposite sex, angry and confused little cretin who will never be anything other than a fantasist and loser. There... i answered it for you! Hope it helps Bubbles. Cheerio! Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 3

3:04pm Tue 11 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

If all criminals were hung wouldn't we live in a perfect society?

No need for prisons!

Lower tax for the good!

Cleaner streets for our kids to grow up on!

More food to feed our animals

Or am I just ahead of my time?
If all criminals were hung wouldn't we live in a perfect society? No need for prisons! Lower tax for the good! Cleaner streets for our kids to grow up on! More food to feed our animals Or am I just ahead of my time? makaveli96
  • Score: 0

3:05pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Steven Seagull wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?!
Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?

What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon?

How do you know the numbers, were you there?

Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).
Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy!
Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.
Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded.

Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars?

Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly.

Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.
but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions!

But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy!
and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have!
Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune.

A definite retard trick.
oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.
Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre.

The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside.

Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing.
Pointless and baseless insults? Shhhhh.... whats the point? Im trying to help your friend here. Unless youve got something to bring to the table id keep out of it. And i know its probably a bit above your intellect level but i will put it in simple terms for you: Im trying to find out why Bubbles is so insecure, weak and inadequate that he justifys gang violence on elderly people, and also why he calls people junkies yet glorifys cocaine use in his user name. it could get interesting. lets see what he comes up with...
Please feel free to point out where I have justified gang violence on the elderly?

Please also confirm where I have called anyone a junky.

Thanks in advance
you are welcome Bubbles.

And here is the information you are after:

You suggested i was a junky when you said "Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?" and yet your user name clearly glorifies cocaine use

and:

You justified the gang attack on the old people when you (wrongly) stated "Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners" (this was totally undermined by the landlord of the miners who said of the SWFC fans "they were all properly signed in" and that " there has never been any trouble with these lads".

Now back to my questions of you Bubbles... why do you justify gang violence on innocent elderly football fans and why do you call people junkies and yet glorify cocaine use in your user name?

Thanks in advance!
So I 'suggested' you were a junky by mentioning methadone? So I didn't actually call you a junky then?? Point one disproved

You also don't seem to have pointed out where I JUSTIFIED the gang violence on the elderly, I merely pointed out correctly that there had been Sheffield Wednesday supporters causing trouble in Burnley town centre prior to the match. So I think you need to try again with this one, try and find a comment where I justify this please. Point Two disproved

Also, I hardly think my username 'glorifies' the use of cocaine you hyper-sensitive, precious little soldier.
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Steven Seagull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Caused trouble by just being there? 50 and 60 year olds? Its u rewriting history. Now go and watch green street and knock one out again and dream of being suicide squads top boy storming the home end at bury. ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzz.... juvenile!. Suicide squad eh? What a misnomer. Hardly suicide attacking old men when outnumbering them 2 to 1. Proper brave that is! Expect a Victoria Cross for Valour for that one!?!?![/p][/quote]Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone? What on earth are you rambling on about you ill-educated goon? How do you know the numbers, were you there? Impressive mockrage though, looks like you have reached Defcon 1,calm yourself down sunshine you will give yourself a coronary (hopefully).[/p][/quote]Its u glorifying drug use with ur name you coked up junky juvenile streak of nothingness. Now jog along and jerk to ur dreams of manliness. Danny Dyer has nothing on u. And by that I mean that u are puerile, lowest common denomination, inadequate, cowardly and not a little bit slow. If u think its tough or clever attacking old men in a gang then u really do belong, well, on the longshite with the rest of the cowardly lobotomised bullies. If met a thousand football hooligans in my time and 1 on 1 they are shells of men. A bit like u cocaine boy![/p][/quote]Oh... and in answer to your question... the numbers are mentioned in the article, 40 lads on 16 old men, but u probably missed that u twitchy sniffing bubbled up degenerate.but given ur mentality u will no doubt claim it as a result. Well done to the Sue Squad. Your mobs got a girls name eh? Very apt.[/p][/quote]Would you call your daughter Suicide? I would avoid the vodka on your morning cornflakes if I were you - it makes you overly-aggressive and slightly retarded. Sounds like you have got anger issues old man, maybe you should consider therapy. It will definitely help with your rambly shouting online outbursts. Are you one of those tramps that shout at passing cars? Also, care to point out where I said it was tough or clever what happened at the Miners - no you can't because I didn't, I think you lost the point when you started to get all silly. Hope you get better soon you bellwipe.[/p][/quote]but u certainly tried to justify their behaviour didnt you by saying the pensioners had (ahem) caused trouble earlier and that therefore shows u somehow approve of what they did, isnt that right sniffer? However the landlord of the miners seemed to contradict this by saying they came over every year and were respectful and no bother to anyone. oooOOOoooh... Hang on... did i say 'no bother to anyone'... sounds like perfectly fair game to a football hooligan pansy doesnt it? 'Dont u Wednesday fans dare sit there all vulnerable... dont u know we smash vulnerable groups of innocent citizens round here??' - which, if you are honest, is what this boiled down to isnt it? a bunch of cowardly bullies outnumbering and battering a small group of elderly innocents. You must be so proud. no wonder you justify their actions! But, to be fair, credit where its due. Those brave 40 Bumley 'Sue' warriors were only defending the right of the locals of the miners to sit on their usual tables and chairs in the club. maybe 40 bronze statues are in order? or a campaign? FREE THE BUMLEY 40!!! You are a coked up dullard sniffer. you contradict yourself. and you are easily put in your place. Now run along, theres a good little bubbled-up chest-banging pansy![/p][/quote]and just to make it easier for you to understand... the message above is me pointing out that u actually did do the thing you claimed to not do in your last message... i.e. talk it tough, justify the violence and generally talk total bubbles. and if you also read it again, its me stating violence (especially bullying gang violence, is pathetic and weak. try to keep up dummy! maybe thats down to all the bubble you sniff though eh sniffer? oh sorry... its 2% charlie isnt it. what a very glamorous life you must have![/p][/quote]Ha ha ha talking and quoting yourself you loony tune. A definite retard trick.[/p][/quote]oh no bubbles. im clearly not quoting myself, im highlighting your contradictions and then (because i know i need to) explaining it to you to try and help you recognise and explain hopefully why you do this. And you are avoiding it arent you, which is a sure fire sign of someone losing an arguement isnt it? again, be honest. Your contradictions are written above. we can all see them, so dont deny it Bubbles. Come on. im trying to help you here but you are just not helping yourself. Lets get to the bottom of this. Come on. Why do you glorify and justify bullying gang violence on elderly football fans? Let it out. it will be a weight off your shoulders and could be the start of you getting well.[/p][/quote]Speaking of a weight off your shoulders why don't you go and have a lie down Norman. It must be hard work for them carrying a cranium with a forehead the size of a drive in movie theatre. The council must have had to adapt your bedsit external door frame to enable you to get your gargantuan swede inside. Norman T Wrangler = another example of how care in the community in Shadsworth is failing.[/p][/quote]Pointless and baseless insults? Shhhhh.... whats the point? Im trying to help your friend here. Unless youve got something to bring to the table id keep out of it. And i know its probably a bit above your intellect level but i will put it in simple terms for you: Im trying to find out why Bubbles is so insecure, weak and inadequate that he justifys gang violence on elderly people, and also why he calls people junkies yet glorifys cocaine use in his user name. it could get interesting. lets see what he comes up with...[/p][/quote]Please feel free to point out where I have justified gang violence on the elderly? Please also confirm where I have called anyone a junky. Thanks in advance[/p][/quote]you are welcome Bubbles. And here is the information you are after: You suggested i was a junky when you said "Have you just been to the chemist to get your methadone?" and yet your user name clearly glorifies cocaine use and: You justified the gang attack on the old people when you (wrongly) stated "Completely and utterly wrong, in fact the 'some blokes having a few beers' that you refer to had already caused trouble before the match in Wetherspoons and also in the Miners" (this was totally undermined by the landlord of the miners who said of the SWFC fans "they were all properly signed in" and that " there has never been any trouble with these lads". Now back to my questions of you Bubbles... why do you justify gang violence on innocent elderly football fans and why do you call people junkies and yet glorify cocaine use in your user name? Thanks in advance![/p][/quote]So I 'suggested' you were a junky by mentioning methadone? So I didn't actually call you a junky then?? Point one disproved You also don't seem to have pointed out where I JUSTIFIED the gang violence on the elderly, I merely pointed out correctly that there had been Sheffield Wednesday supporters causing trouble in Burnley town centre prior to the match. So I think you need to try again with this one, try and find a comment where I justify this please. Point Two disproved Also, I hardly think my username 'glorifies' the use of cocaine you hyper-sensitive, precious little soldier. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -2

3:08pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
No reply? Youre too easy Bubbles. Know your place eh liitle man! and next time you are bubbled up, chest banging and 'wanting to' but 'not quite being brave enough' to smack some vulnerable away fan, you just remember that you are a no-mark, cowardly, contradictory, under-achieving, invisible to society and especially the opposite sex, angry and confused little cretin who will never be anything other than a fantasist and loser. There... i answered it for you! Hope it helps Bubbles. Cheerio!
Calm down, calm down, I can picture you drooling over your keyboard, your knuckles white and calloused, refreshing the page every ten seconds waiting for a rely.

Try stepping outside, talking to actual people, maybe even a real live woman - I think it will help you and your Aspergers a great deal.
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: No reply? Youre too easy Bubbles. Know your place eh liitle man! and next time you are bubbled up, chest banging and 'wanting to' but 'not quite being brave enough' to smack some vulnerable away fan, you just remember that you are a no-mark, cowardly, contradictory, under-achieving, invisible to society and especially the opposite sex, angry and confused little cretin who will never be anything other than a fantasist and loser. There... i answered it for you! Hope it helps Bubbles. Cheerio![/p][/quote]Calm down, calm down, I can picture you drooling over your keyboard, your knuckles white and calloused, refreshing the page every ten seconds waiting for a rely. Try stepping outside, talking to actual people, maybe even a real live woman - I think it will help you and your Aspergers a great deal. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: 6

3:20pm Tue 11 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

It's a bit rich David Cameron condemning parents who smoke with their children in the car.

At least those parents remembered to put their kids in the car.
It's a bit rich David Cameron condemning parents who smoke with their children in the car. At least those parents remembered to put their kids in the car. makaveli96
  • Score: 2

3:23pm Tue 11 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

My wife says she is divorcing me because of my obsession with television dramas.

But will she really leave me...

...Find out next week!
My wife says she is divorcing me because of my obsession with television dramas. But will she really leave me... ...Find out next week! makaveli96
  • Score: 9

3:27pm Tue 11 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

If you said you were an asylum seeker in the nineteenth century,

People would think you were mad.
If you said you were an asylum seeker in the nineteenth century, People would think you were mad. makaveli96
  • Score: 8

3:30pm Tue 11 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

The other day I held the door open for a clown.

I thought it was a nice jester.
The other day I held the door open for a clown. I thought it was a nice jester. makaveli96
  • Score: 5

3:33pm Tue 11 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

I hope my wife is like her mother when she's 60.

Her Mother died when she was 58.
I hope my wife is like her mother when she's 60. Her Mother died when she was 58. makaveli96
  • Score: 3

3:34pm Tue 11 Feb 14

CeeBee85 says...

makaveli96 wrote:
It's a bit rich David Cameron condemning parents who smoke with their children in the car. At least those parents remembered to put their kids in the car.
Wrong article?
[quote][p][bold]makaveli96[/bold] wrote: It's a bit rich David Cameron condemning parents who smoke with their children in the car. At least those parents remembered to put their kids in the car.[/p][/quote]Wrong article? CeeBee85
  • Score: 1

3:34pm Tue 11 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

I saw a Great Dane tied to a cycle stand outside Asda today so I phoned the RSPCA.

What kind of sick person rides their dog to go shopping?
I saw a Great Dane tied to a cycle stand outside Asda today so I phoned the RSPCA. What kind of sick person rides their dog to go shopping? makaveli96
  • Score: 1

3:38pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
No reply? Youre too easy Bubbles. Know your place eh liitle man! and next time you are bubbled up, chest banging and 'wanting to' but 'not quite being brave enough' to smack some vulnerable away fan, you just remember that you are a no-mark, cowardly, contradictory, under-achieving, invisible to society and especially the opposite sex, angry and confused little cretin who will never be anything other than a fantasist and loser. There... i answered it for you! Hope it helps Bubbles. Cheerio!
Calm down, calm down, I can picture you drooling over your keyboard, your knuckles white and calloused, refreshing the page every ten seconds waiting for a rely.

Try stepping outside, talking to actual people, maybe even a real live woman - I think it will help you and your Aspergers a great deal.
Says the dweeb who comments on every rovers related article! You priceless, honestly. And I notice you still havent answered my questions. When u do ill reply. And until you do everyone can see that you have just been spanked. And you know it too.
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: No reply? Youre too easy Bubbles. Know your place eh liitle man! and next time you are bubbled up, chest banging and 'wanting to' but 'not quite being brave enough' to smack some vulnerable away fan, you just remember that you are a no-mark, cowardly, contradictory, under-achieving, invisible to society and especially the opposite sex, angry and confused little cretin who will never be anything other than a fantasist and loser. There... i answered it for you! Hope it helps Bubbles. Cheerio![/p][/quote]Calm down, calm down, I can picture you drooling over your keyboard, your knuckles white and calloused, refreshing the page every ten seconds waiting for a rely. Try stepping outside, talking to actual people, maybe even a real live woman - I think it will help you and your Aspergers a great deal.[/p][/quote]Says the dweeb who comments on every rovers related article! You priceless, honestly. And I notice you still havent answered my questions. When u do ill reply. And until you do everyone can see that you have just been spanked. And you know it too. Norman T Wangler
  • Score: -1

3:40pm Tue 11 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

Manchester United made 81 crosses against Stoke.

Wayne Rooney hasn't seen that amount of crosses since his GCSE maths exam.
Manchester United made 81 crosses against Stoke. Wayne Rooney hasn't seen that amount of crosses since his GCSE maths exam. makaveli96
  • Score: 7

3:44pm Tue 11 Feb 14

makaveli96 says...

Why did they invent seven string guitars?

So people in Burnley and Bacup can learn to play.
Why did they invent seven string guitars? So people in Burnley and Bacup can learn to play. makaveli96
  • Score: 1

4:01pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Champagne plus charlie says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Norman T Wangler wrote:
No reply? Youre too easy Bubbles. Know your place eh liitle man! and next time you are bubbled up, chest banging and 'wanting to' but 'not quite being brave enough' to smack some vulnerable away fan, you just remember that you are a no-mark, cowardly, contradictory, under-achieving, invisible to society and especially the opposite sex, angry and confused little cretin who will never be anything other than a fantasist and loser. There... i answered it for you! Hope it helps Bubbles. Cheerio!
Calm down, calm down, I can picture you drooling over your keyboard, your knuckles white and calloused, refreshing the page every ten seconds waiting for a rely.

Try stepping outside, talking to actual people, maybe even a real live woman - I think it will help you and your Aspergers a great deal.
Says the dweeb who comments on every rovers related article! You priceless, honestly. And I notice you still havent answered my questions. When u do ill reply. And until you do everyone can see that you have just been spanked. And you know it too.
Oh dear, you are getting so annoyed that you have lost the ability to punctuate and spell properly haven't you precious?

So, I will ask you again (by the way, I have typed this slowly as you evidently can't read very fast) - please point out where I CALLED anyone a junky and please point out where I JUSTIFIED the attack at the Miners.

You have already tried and failed once to do this, so I won't hold my breath, and anyway I am setting off to Bolton within the hour as we look to consolidate our SECOND PLACE in the table.

Jealous much sat in your Shadsworth dosshouse, watching your better neighbours fighting at the end of the table where you wish so much you were involved?

Never mind, your car crash of a season will soon be over.
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: No reply? Youre too easy Bubbles. Know your place eh liitle man! and next time you are bubbled up, chest banging and 'wanting to' but 'not quite being brave enough' to smack some vulnerable away fan, you just remember that you are a no-mark, cowardly, contradictory, under-achieving, invisible to society and especially the opposite sex, angry and confused little cretin who will never be anything other than a fantasist and loser. There... i answered it for you! Hope it helps Bubbles. Cheerio![/p][/quote]Calm down, calm down, I can picture you drooling over your keyboard, your knuckles white and calloused, refreshing the page every ten seconds waiting for a rely. Try stepping outside, talking to actual people, maybe even a real live woman - I think it will help you and your Aspergers a great deal.[/p][/quote]Says the dweeb who comments on every rovers related article! You priceless, honestly. And I notice you still havent answered my questions. When u do ill reply. And until you do everyone can see that you have just been spanked. And you know it too.[/p][/quote]Oh dear, you are getting so annoyed that you have lost the ability to punctuate and spell properly haven't you precious? So, I will ask you again (by the way, I have typed this slowly as you evidently can't read very fast) - please point out where I CALLED anyone a junky and please point out where I JUSTIFIED the attack at the Miners. You have already tried and failed once to do this, so I won't hold my breath, and anyway I am setting off to Bolton within the hour as we look to consolidate our SECOND PLACE in the table. Jealous much sat in your Shadsworth dosshouse, watching your better neighbours fighting at the end of the table where you wish so much you were involved? Never mind, your car crash of a season will soon be over. Champagne plus charlie
  • Score: -5

4:59pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Norman T Wangler says...

oh dear bubbles, you really are special. you can attempt to deny it but it doesnt mean you are telling the truth. and im pretty confident my summary of you is pretty much spot on. I ask you the same valid points several times and all you do is avoid answering them. ive answered all your questions. Avoidance is as good as admittance and its all above in print for everyone to see. I honestly believe i could eat Alphabetti Spaghetti and p o o p more sense than you write. to say u spend your entire life practicing put downs and come backs and insults on here you are really lame at it. So... goodbye boring! ill come back in the future to spank u again though so dont worry.
oh dear bubbles, you really are special. you can attempt to deny it but it doesnt mean you are telling the truth. and im pretty confident my summary of you is pretty much spot on. I ask you the same valid points several times and all you do is avoid answering them. ive answered all your questions. Avoidance is as good as admittance and its all above in print for everyone to see. I honestly believe i could eat Alphabetti Spaghetti and p o o p more sense than you write. to say u spend your entire life practicing put downs and come backs and insults on here you are really lame at it. So... goodbye boring! ill come back in the future to spank u again though so dont worry. Norman T Wangler
  • Score: 0

5:17pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Stone Island: says...

Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Stone Island: wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Stone Island: wrote:
Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad?

This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this!
Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets.

Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice.

Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.
Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'.
You are the wrong side of 40 and you call yourself after the hooligan label of choice??

Oh dear.
Says the man who once had the username of 'Gammon Flap'! Only a brain-dead dingle would call himself after a slang term for the female genitals. You must have the brains of a rocking horse.

I notice that you haven't yet condemned your fellow morons, for an horrific attack on a group of men, of PENSION AGE.

If there are any Bolton fans reading this, be careful if you are going to the game tonight with your father, or grandfather. They may become the victims of an unprovoked attack by the Silly Squad.
[quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad? This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this![/p][/quote]Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets. Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice. Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.[/p][/quote]Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'.[/p][/quote]You are the wrong side of 40 and you call yourself after the hooligan label of choice?? Oh dear.[/p][/quote]Says the man who once had the username of 'Gammon Flap'! Only a brain-dead dingle would call himself after a slang term for the female genitals. You must have the brains of a rocking horse. I notice that you haven't yet condemned your fellow morons, for an horrific attack on a group of men, of PENSION AGE. If there are any Bolton fans reading this, be careful if you are going to the game tonight with your father, or grandfather. They may become the victims of an unprovoked attack by the Silly Squad. Stone Island:
  • Score: 8

5:56pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Chris P Bacon says...

Yet another depressing outbreak of East Lancs bicker-fest, here. The attempts at point-scoring is like seeing two bald men fighting over a comb.
Yet another depressing outbreak of East Lancs bicker-fest, here. The attempts at point-scoring is like seeing two bald men fighting over a comb. Chris P Bacon
  • Score: 1

7:08pm Tue 11 Feb 14

hasslem hasslem says...

Chris P Bacon wrote:
Yet another depressing outbreak of East Lancs bicker-fest, here. The attempts at point-scoring is like seeing two bald men fighting over a comb.
not from me you will note the plastic pious scouser who pretends to be a dingle.

made very valid point and then one of your associated dingle chums tried to pass the blame onto sheffield wednesday supporters and then launched into a trail of vile invective and refused to condemn the acts of his local chums its like back to the day of pravda and radio russia or comical ali

oh, and by the way i think the two bald men you are referring to are in the poor quality cctv images linked to this story
[quote][p][bold]Chris P Bacon[/bold] wrote: Yet another depressing outbreak of East Lancs bicker-fest, here. The attempts at point-scoring is like seeing two bald men fighting over a comb.[/p][/quote]not from me you will note the plastic pious scouser who pretends to be a dingle. made very valid point and then one of your associated dingle chums tried to pass the blame onto sheffield wednesday supporters and then launched into a trail of vile invective and refused to condemn the acts of his local chums its like back to the day of pravda and radio russia or comical ali oh, and by the way i think the two bald men you are referring to are in the poor quality cctv images linked to this story hasslem hasslem
  • Score: -7

12:22am Wed 12 Feb 14

leyton says...

hasslem hasslem wrote:
i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests.

the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game.

those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban.

.....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!!
you moron do you just believe anything the filth or this rag say bizarre.
[quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote: i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests. the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game. those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban. .....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!![/p][/quote]you moron do you just believe anything the filth or this rag say bizarre. leyton
  • Score: -7

8:06am Wed 12 Feb 14

hasslem hasslem says...

leyton wrote:
hasslem hasslem wrote:
i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests.

the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game.

those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban.

.....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!!
you moron do you just believe anything the filth or this rag say bizarre.
i believe more of what is written in the LT than comes from any of your orifices.

why don't you stick to beating some OAPs up like your mates seem to enjoy.

very brave
[quote][p][bold]leyton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]hasslem hasslem[/bold] wrote: i was criticised on here for condemning these hooligans as a cheap dig at burnley fc - but at no time mentioned the football club, whilst bunley posters on here were questioning why there was no mention of sheffield arrests. the story here points to an unprovoked (if i read the story correctly) attack by local hoodlums (SOME OVER THE AGE OF 50!!!) on some blokes having a few beers before a football game. those that did this attack are nothing short of neanderthals. if they prove to be followers of burnley fc - i hope the football club bans them for life - and sticks to the ban. .....and for those of a local disposition - if there are any from south yorkshire found to provoke an attack - then i hope they are arrested too!![/p][/quote]you moron do you just believe anything the filth or this rag say bizarre.[/p][/quote]i believe more of what is written in the LT than comes from any of your orifices. why don't you stick to beating some OAPs up like your mates seem to enjoy. very brave hasslem hasslem
  • Score: -5

10:47am Thu 13 Feb 14

Homewise says...

Quotes from the Steward so the strory is as it says. I have a friend that sings and he was the entertainer the night after this incident and every club member he spoke to said that this was exactly what happened. Wednesday fans sat there quietly enjoying a pint and the said Dingle Neanderthals then entered the club mob handed and attacked them for no reason whatsoever. Now correct me if I am wrong but any of you Burnley luddites that are burying you heads in the sand and trying to justify this are just as bad as the cowardly idiotic Neanderthals that attacked these elderly supporters with kids nearby. Disgrace...end of !
Quotes from the Steward so the strory is as it says. I have a friend that sings and he was the entertainer the night after this incident and every club member he spoke to said that this was exactly what happened. Wednesday fans sat there quietly enjoying a pint and the said Dingle Neanderthals then entered the club mob handed and attacked them for no reason whatsoever. Now correct me if I am wrong but any of you Burnley luddites that are burying you heads in the sand and trying to justify this are just as bad as the cowardly idiotic Neanderthals that attacked these elderly supporters with kids nearby. Disgrace...end of ! Homewise
  • Score: 8

4:06pm Mon 24 Feb 14

Burnley59/60 says...

Norman T Wangler wrote:
Typical burnley. Hard when the odds are stacked. Made a reputation in division 3 when swamping towns like rochdale and halifax. Impressive. Just a lower division man united. Typical inadequate bullies. Time to come out of the 80s all u chest banging dimwits!
football is not about violence BAN THE LOT FOR LIFE
[quote][p][bold]Norman T Wangler[/bold] wrote: Typical burnley. Hard when the odds are stacked. Made a reputation in division 3 when swamping towns like rochdale and halifax. Impressive. Just a lower division man united. Typical inadequate bullies. Time to come out of the 80s all u chest banging dimwits![/p][/quote]football is not about violence BAN THE LOT FOR LIFE Burnley59/60
  • Score: 1

4:10pm Mon 24 Feb 14

Burnley59/60 says...

Homewise wrote:
Quotes from the Steward so the strory is as it says. I have a friend that sings and he was the entertainer the night after this incident and every club member he spoke to said that this was exactly what happened. Wednesday fans sat there quietly enjoying a pint and the said Dingle Neanderthals then entered the club mob handed and attacked them for no reason whatsoever. Now correct me if I am wrong but any of you Burnley luddites that are burying you heads in the sand and trying to justify this are just as bad as the cowardly idiotic Neanderthals that attacked these elderly supporters with kids nearby. Disgrace...end of !
I am a Burnley Fan i was born in the town and im proud of it.These people make me fume Id lock them up for 20 years each just like THE IDIOT POTTER THE ELECTRIC CHAIR WOULD SAVE THE TAX PAYER MONEY !!!!ITS WHAT HE AND THEY NEED
[quote][p][bold]Homewise[/bold] wrote: Quotes from the Steward so the strory is as it says. I have a friend that sings and he was the entertainer the night after this incident and every club member he spoke to said that this was exactly what happened. Wednesday fans sat there quietly enjoying a pint and the said Dingle Neanderthals then entered the club mob handed and attacked them for no reason whatsoever. Now correct me if I am wrong but any of you Burnley luddites that are burying you heads in the sand and trying to justify this are just as bad as the cowardly idiotic Neanderthals that attacked these elderly supporters with kids nearby. Disgrace...end of ![/p][/quote]I am a Burnley Fan i was born in the town and im proud of it.These people make me fume Id lock them up for 20 years each just like THE IDIOT POTTER THE ELECTRIC CHAIR WOULD SAVE THE TAX PAYER MONEY !!!!ITS WHAT HE AND THEY NEED Burnley59/60
  • Score: 1

4:12pm Mon 24 Feb 14

Burnley59/60 says...

Stone Island: wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Stone Island: wrote:
Champagne plus charlie wrote:
Stone Island: wrote:
Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad?

This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this!
Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets.

Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice.

Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.
Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'.
You are the wrong side of 40 and you call yourself after the hooligan label of choice??

Oh dear.
Says the man who once had the username of 'Gammon Flap'! Only a brain-dead dingle would call himself after a slang term for the female genitals. You must have the brains of a rocking horse.

I notice that you haven't yet condemned your fellow morons, for an horrific attack on a group of men, of PENSION AGE.

If there are any Bolton fans reading this, be careful if you are going to the game tonight with your father, or grandfather. They may become the victims of an unprovoked attack by the Silly Squad.
As A REAL Burnley Fan THEY WANT LOCKING UP IDIOTS !!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Champagne plus charlie[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: Well well well. Here we have it. Typical LOW LIFE Burnley fans in all their glory. Attacking OLD MEN, some of which are of PENSION AGE. Well hard aren't they, this Silly Squad? This is exactly the reason such draconian measures have been introduced for our derby games. Burnley's scum fans just can't be trusted. They are renown for this sort of thing throughout the game; attacking soft targets. I trust that when these scum fans are caught, they are locked up with the rest of the Silly Squad. There is no place in our society for SCUM like this![/p][/quote]Attacking soft targets? pmsl, you mean like the toilets at Burnley or the seats that you gimps smash up every single year you play us - seats and toilets don't fight back, they are definitely soft targets. Why do you call yourself Stone Island? Is it because you are a wannabe hooligan? I mean why else would you name yourself after the football hooligan designer outfit of choice. Sad pathetic chav hooligan wannabe.[/p][/quote]Wannabe? I'm the wrong side of forty you fool. Hardly a wannabe. I notice you're not condemning the moronic behaviour of your fellow 'fans'.[/p][/quote]You are the wrong side of 40 and you call yourself after the hooligan label of choice?? Oh dear.[/p][/quote]Says the man who once had the username of 'Gammon Flap'! Only a brain-dead dingle would call himself after a slang term for the female genitals. You must have the brains of a rocking horse. I notice that you haven't yet condemned your fellow morons, for an horrific attack on a group of men, of PENSION AGE. If there are any Bolton fans reading this, be careful if you are going to the game tonight with your father, or grandfather. They may become the victims of an unprovoked attack by the Silly Squad.[/p][/quote]As A REAL Burnley Fan THEY WANT LOCKING UP IDIOTS !!!!! Burnley59/60
  • Score: 0

11:13pm Mon 10 Mar 14

stevieclaret says...

TurfMoorTom wrote:
I wouldn't be sure it was anything to do with the Sheff Weds fans - we've been known to smash up our own town before. I can't believe we'd go in mob handed to sort out some OAP's. Surely it must just be our usual mindless vandalism through sheer frustration at lack of any notable success over the past decades.
That's a new low for u ewood Tom or fakevilla. We know who u r
[quote][p][bold]TurfMoorTom[/bold] wrote: I wouldn't be sure it was anything to do with the Sheff Weds fans - we've been known to smash up our own town before. I can't believe we'd go in mob handed to sort out some OAP's. Surely it must just be our usual mindless vandalism through sheer frustration at lack of any notable success over the past decades.[/p][/quote]That's a new low for u ewood Tom or fakevilla. We know who u r stevieclaret
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree